http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8220
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> 2012-06-14 00:51:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=1115) [details]
> failing test case
I think this test case is not correct code.
(From test case)
> alias typeof(Length*Length) Area;
> alias typeof(Length*Area) Volume;
> alias typeof(Mass/Volume) Density;
> alias typeof(Length*Mass/Time/Time) Force;
> alias typeof(1/Time) Frequency;
> alias typeof(Force/Area) Pressure;
> alias typeof(Force*Length) Energy;
> alias typeof(Energy/Time) Power;
> alias typeof(Time*Current) Charge;
> alias typeof(Power/Current) Voltage;
> alias typeof(Charge/Voltage) Capacitance;
> alias typeof(Voltage/Current) Resistance;
> alias typeof(1/Resistance) Conductance;
> alias typeof(Voltage*Time) MagneticFlux;
> alias typeof(MagneticFlux/Area) MagneticFluxDensity;
> alias typeof(MagneticFlux/Current) Inductance;
> alias typeof(Intensity*UnitLess) LuminousFlux;
> alias typeof(LuminousFlux/Area) Illuminance;
As far as I know, normal expressions cannot take Type as their operands, even
if it is defined by operator overloading.
struct S { void opMul(S s){} }
S + S; // this is INVALID code
This rule should be applied even in typeof expression, then
typeof(Length*Length) must be invalid.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
