http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857
--- Comment #81 from Stewart Gordon <s...@iname.com> 2012-07-10 05:05:48 PDT --- (In reply to comment #80) > (In reply to comment #79) >> - we have variadics that are really just C's variadics with >> typeinfo added > > We also have C's variadics. But no use case I can see for using a C-style variadic for a D class method. >> Something else I should've realised earlier: Why do D class methods >> need to be directly callable from C? (How does C code hold a >> reference to a D object, anyway?) Indeed, is even C++ designed to >> accommodate this? > > COM classes defined in D are callable from C (and you could define > other classes the same way). But do any COM interfaces define C-style variadic methods? Do we need to be open to this possibility, or are we wasting our time by worrying about it? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------