http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8530
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Kozak <kozz...@gmail.com> 2012-08-10 03:19:42 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > If you want to check for NaN, then use std.math.isNaN. As I understand it, > there is no guarantee that two NaN values have the same bit pattern (at > minimum, you have signed and unsigned NaN, and there may be more variations - > I > don't remember). isNaN returns true in both cases. So, I don't believe that > this is a bug. Thanks for your reply. However I still think it is a bug, because when I assign TYPE.init to variable VAR of type TYPE, and then I compare VAR is TYPE.init, I assumed it returns true; -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------