http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8649
Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> 2012-09-16 04:53:49 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > This is a dup of issue 4090. > > At first sight it doesn't look like the same issue, because here I am listing > all the types and modifiers. "const ref int" is refused, while "ref const int" > is accepted. In both cases no type inferencing is required. > > While in issue 4090 I put "const ref" so some type inferencing was required. > > In the end if you think it's the same issue feel free to close this issue as a > duplicated. Thank you. As I explained in the issue, it's current grammar limitation, and it doesn't matter whether a type inference is required. So I'll change this to 'resolved duplicated'. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 4090 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------