http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4272
--- Comment #6 from Nick Treleaven <ntrel-pub...@yahoo.co.uk> 2012-10-06 10:28:49 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The problem is that UFCS was made to work with functions and typeof is not a > function. Accepting identifier.typeof would result in questions about which > identifiers are valid for this and what else works besides typeof with them. This is not to do with UFCS. There are already many built in properties like x.sizeof, x.init: http://dlang.org/property.html typeof fits nicely as a built in property, and helps cut down on nested brackets. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
