http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8863
--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> 2012-11-14 01:07:54 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > The example you gave an example of a bug where a reference to a local is > returned, something entirely different. No, they are is related. My argue is: there is no generic rule which make Tuple!(X, Y) un-nested but fun!A make nested. TemplateInstance::hasNestedArgs() works on the template instance, so it cannot know the actual instantiated result is a type (from Tuple!(X, Y)) or a function (from fun!A). It's time paradox. To implement your argument, we need much special code to support the case. It increases the compiler complexity for the much less benefit. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------