http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> 2012-11-23 04:57:35 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > If @property is all about equivalence of fields and accessors, then &foo > should > not return a function pointer. Then, there is no way to get a function pointer from property function, right? > IMHO obtaining the funtion pointer should be the > special case. std.traits.FunctionTypeOf!(property_func) is a special case? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
