http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065
--- Comment #5 from David Nadlinger <c...@klickverbot.at> 2012-11-24 11:51:44 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Does that not test if T is some sort of function pointer? > > ...actually, that's some sort of special case overloaded meaning of the > function keyword in conjunction with 'is' isn't it? I think I remember running > into that like, a year ago. I recall being very confused at the time. > Will that only pass in function definitions? Will exclude function pointers? Yes, this is one of the ugliest parts of the is() syntax. You are probably right, the fact alone that "function" has a different meaning here than in the rest of the language probably warrants inclusion of an isFunction() trait… -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
