http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044
--- Comment #5 from Walter Bright <bugzi...@digitalmars.com> 2012-12-23 12:13:04 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Common! 7-Zip has [one of] the best compression ratio, small compression time, > good GUI and explorer integration, so why not to use it? Who cares? File size simply no longer matters, especially not 5K. I've already spend magnitudes more time trying to get it uncompressed than any microseconds it supposedly saves. I'm not spending any more time on it. > Also why not to use the installer? If you really want to do everything > manually, why are you complaining about errors? It is you decision to not use > installer and user-friendly GUI. If it's my fault that 7z.exe does not work with 7z files, that makes me even less interested in 7z. > But if you for some reason need to use 7z.exe, you also need 7z.dll for "code > that works with archives". That's exactly why I don't care to use it. It does not work without mucking about with it. .zip works everywhere, no issues. Please upload the files in a usable format. I'm interested in fixing the bug in this issue. I couldn't be less interested in wrestling with 7z. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------