http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9547
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> 2013-02-19 21:02:53 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) > This worked in 2.061, and broke LuaD in 2.062. The workaround (or rather the > new valid code) is: > > alias typeof(T.init[0]) ElemType; This is bug fix for issue 6408. `T[0]` should be always analyzed as "zero length static array of T", but it was *accidentally* treated as T.init[0]. > However this change *must* be clearly documented in the changelog, and the > requirement should be part of the documentation somewhere. I can agree that some of proper bug fixes require clear explanation for better migration. We need to pay attention for them in beta phase, and document them. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------