http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7176
--- Comment #18 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2013-03-20 13:33:49 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I don't like this feature. Because:
>
> 1. it would reduce code readability.
>
On the contrary! It also increases language consistency.
> class LibClass {
> int foo() { return 1; }
> string bar() => "hi";
> }
>
> Mixing lambda syntax and normal function syntax looks messy.
>
No. It is normal function syntax that looks messy in this case.
class LibClass {
auto foo() => 1;
auto bar() => "hi";
}
> 2. Just only reducing 7 character is too small benefit.
>
7*_N_ characters. Also, it can get rid of additional indentation.
> auto foo()=>expr;
> auto foo(){return expr;}
>
> With more complex function signature:
>
> ComplexReturnType!(..) foo(T, U, V)(T t, U u, V v) if (...)=>expr;
> ComplexReturnType!(..) foo(T, U, V)(T t, U u, V v) if (...){return expr;}
>
> Ratio will fall further.
This is not a valid argument in any case.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
