http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9771
--- Comment #9 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-03-23 08:20:16 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I think that will conflict with having a moving garbage collector. Good point, maybe the correct approach is to hash the respective hashes of each member of the class? @Jonathan: I agree, the default toHash should not be generated if the class/struct defines opEquals. It's the user's responsibility to keep the two consistent. So basically, the default toHash should correspond to whatever == corresponds with by default. If == is bitwise comparison, then toHash also should be bitwise hash, etc.. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
