http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9749
--- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-03-23 18:19:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Both of these proposals were rejected. I see. Thank you for all. > But if he can do that for the return type, he can also do it > for the parameter. So the feature doesn't add much of anything. This is not true. Specifying it once instead of twice is more DRY, and this is good. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
