http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9895
--- Comment #5 from IdanArye <generic...@gmail.com> 2013-04-08 13:10:03 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Only to add: > 5) We can always add better abstraction if/when we are confident it's actualy > better. > > P.S. Doing minor correction - I'm reopening this untill the pull gets in. > Let's > do it pedantically in order ;) > > @IdanArye > > What we've unofficially all came to is a 3 step procedure: > 1. Report > 2. Pull posted there and keyword _pull_ is set. > 3. Commits get posted automatically by post-commit hook, then somebody takes > time to check and close it. > > For the moment we are (sort of) at the stage 2. Oh, sorry. Had no idea about needing the `pull` keyword, or auto-closing when the request is pulled. My previous contribution to Phobos was done entirely on GitHub... Just to be clear - the rule is still to use a single commit message for the contribution, using git's history rewriting functionality to make fixes, right? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
