http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10183
--- Comment #3 from Jakob Ovrum <jakobov...@gmail.com> 2013-05-27 06:04:44 PDT --- Yeah, I noticed after posting. The problem with the amended caller code is that it leaks implementation details, as it were. It would be nice if there was a good way to solve this particular abstraction problem. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
