http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10763
--- Comment #3 from Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> 2013-08-12 17:13:15 PDT --- It's basically the same as issue 10266. The corner cases arise if you still disallow &x + 1. My guess is that you're allowing it in your implementation? The problem with allowing it is that we're departing from C. And there's annoying things like: // global scope int x; int *p = &x + 1; // points to junk! - must not compile Is there really a use case for this unsafe behaviour? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
