http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10816
--- Comment #3 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2013-08-13 09:01:05 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I like the idea. Both because of consistency and because that '!' near to 'i' > is so hard to notice. > > @Timon > > I don't think "is(T1) && !is(T1==T2)" is any useful. It will make "is(T1 != > T2) > return false for invalid T1 which is rather surprising. I can't imagine the > use > case for it. Are you aware that is(T1==T2) gives false for invalid T1 and error for invalid T2? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------