http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11108



--- Comment #7 from Denis Shelomovskij <verylonglogin....@gmail.com> 2013-10-12 
16:44:14 MSD ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I don't believe this is a good choice.
> 
> I think a trait can be used inside a runtime check, and as such, all traits
> should always compile.
> 
> This is currently the case for every trait we have, be they in std.traits or
> std.range.
> 
> The trait name is "hasElaborateAssign". It should really just answer yes/no.
> Not yes, no, error.

See
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1623#issuecomment-26196738
for reply:
> So, we are talking about this:
>
> if (isAssignable!SS && !hasElaborateAssign!SS)
>
> Even in the case it would be just rare and uncommon code it is silly to make 
> regular code error-prone (spending programmers time on debugging their 
> mistakes) to support some patterns almost nobody use. But we are talking here 
> about not just rare and uncommon, but almost definitely incorrect 
> construction indicating an error. And you really did the error here [see pull 
> discussion] which my pull shown.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to