https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11322
yebblies <yebbl...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |11317
--- Comment #2 from yebblies <yebbl...@gmail.com> 2013-11-15 00:39:48 EST ---
For analyze, the inliner generates
(b ? i : i)++;
and because the results of the inliner are never run through semantic, it never
gets converted to the lvalue version
(*(b ? &i : &i))++;
This is an inliner bug... The way the inliner interacts with ref is not great.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
