https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=602
--- Comment #16 from Stewart Gordon <[email protected]> 2013-11-19 16:25:39 PST --- (In reply to comment #15) > Designing D (or its front-end implementation) to make it more difficult for > future D compiler writers to implement compiled gotos (that are currently > supported by the back-end of both GCC and Clang, so someone could add them to > LDC2 or GDC without too much work) is silly. Nobody here suggested designing D *to* make it more difficult for future D compiler writers to implement anything. The point is that D has been designed to have initialisations and RAII, and as a side effect it is difficult to implement assigned/computed gotos. Sacrificing these useful features just to make it easier to implement such a feature that will be rarely used (not least because of the inherent unportability resulting from leaving it to third-party extensions) would be silly. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
