https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12287
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Panteleev <thecybersha...@gmail.com> 2014-03-03 04:34:43 EET --- OK, so you pattern-match the template. But I don't think this is a good solution, because any recursive use of __traits(parent) will need to take care of this special case. It goes against the principle of least surprise. What are your arguments against a compiler change? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
