https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #18 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-21 03:46:15 PDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > it would be possible to make `Tuple` and > `args...` co-exist as input argument style. EG: > > r = a.fold!("a + b", "a + b * b")(0.0, 0.0); //OK! > r = a.fold!("a + b", "a + b * b")(tuple(0.0, 0.0)); //OK! too! > > The second one is more verbose, but I see its justified if your seed is > already > in the form of a tuple. What I don't like is to give only 1 single scalar argument if you have N functions and then implicitly multiply the single seed N times. Similar implicit behaviours look handy, but they make the code less clear, and later usually they find some way to bite your rump. On the other hand I think that it's uncommon to give more than one function to reduce/fold. So this whole sub-feature is could even be chopped away, simplifying fold. How many real usages of multi-function reduce to you have in Phobos? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------