https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12446
--- Comment #1 from safety0ff.bugz <safety0ff.b...@gmail.com> 2014-03-23 13:54:09 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > This matters when random access is more expensive than iteration. > > Iteration, if properly implemented, should always at least as fast as > indexing. It occurred to me that the cost of slicing a range could be disproportionate to indexing. Are there any use cases where this is true? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
