https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13586
--- Comment #16 from Sobirari Muhomori <dfj1es...@sneakemail.com> --- (In reply to monarchdodra from comment #15) > I could be talking out of my ass, but I'd *assume* ownership transfer is > required for proper move semantics. AFAIK, move semantics is need only for return values, not for arguments. > foo(getLValue()); > > Here the outerscope calls neither postblit nor destructor. A proposed solution to this issue is to place arguments on the caller's stack, so that's where they're moved, not to the callee's stack. --
