https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364
--- Comment #8 from deadalnix <deadal...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #6) > (In reply to deadalnix from comment #5) > > Reopening. The spec is wrong. It has been discussed many time that should > > have LTR semantic. > > Can you list the links to the discussions? So I reached to Andrei to know the exact details. It turns out this is a point where Andrei and Walter are not in agreement. Andrei advocate for LTR all the way down (as SDC do) and Walter does seems to be inclined to specify it precisely for calls. Anyway, as per spec, a += k is rewritten as a = cast(typeof(a)) (a + k); See http://dlang.org/expression.html, Assignment Operator Expressions for reference. So I think that, even by Walter's standards, as this is not a call, this should be well defined. I opened a thread on the newgroup: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/dqkqvnkgxkxncyvyi...@forum.dlang.org#post-dqkqvnkgxkxncyvyitid:40forum.dlang.org --
