https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14592
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #2) > Could the __U be replaced with an @ ? That is one way to assert it never > gets generated. I think it's not so good idea. @ is used for never mangled things (e.g. Terror, Tinstance, etfc), but __U is *actually* used, even it's only for the internal structure. A note for GDC and LDC: If a TemplateInstance object is "dummy" instance that using __U, its `members` field is NULL. In dmd code, it's excluded at ToObjFile visitor in toobj.c. --
