https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16123
--- Comment #4 from Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> --- I'm having trouble seeing how this logically is different. Access to t.s.x is done by adding some offset to &t, just like access to s.x is done by adding some offset to &s. I get that the "symbol" I'm trying to alias is really a compound symbol, but I can alias it just fine in other places. This reminds me of the whole inability to alias keywords. It's an implementation detail that I shouldn't have to care about! --