https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13572
--- Comment #10 from Sobirari Muhomori <dfj1es...@sneakemail.com> --- (In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #6) > my understanding of @trusted (and @safe, for that matter) is that safety > promise is nullified if someone passing invalid pointer to such functions. That only applies to a @system caller, a @safe caller can't come up with an invalid pointer, but it still can mess with data in other ways, if a @trusted callee can't handle it, it means it has an unsafe interface. --
