https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16302
--- Comment #7 from Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Yuxuan Shui from comment #6) > I want to suggest we just reuse opIndex. If opIndex is defined as a > template, the static semantic is used. This is a good idea. s[arg1, arg2] is lowered to opIndex(arg1, arg2) the compiler could try opIndex!(arg1, arg2) if it applies, otherwise fall back on the normal opIndex. Where I am concerned is the case where runtime indexing accepts template parameters. However, in those cases, the template parameters must all be types, and implied via IFTI, meaning it has runtime parameters that match each type. The static opIndex needs to have zero runtime parameters ALWAYS. I think it still can work. I'd like to continue having the slice usage that is so flexible in the current implementation at compile-time as well. --
