https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7182
Vladimir Panteleev <dlang-bugzi...@thecybershadow.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |dlang-bugzilla@thecybershad
| |ow.net
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Panteleev <dlang-bugzi...@thecybershadow.net> ---
(In reply to Infiltrator from comment #1)
> I think that the issue would instead be with the fact that public functions
> (f() in this case) call invariant() before and after they run, which would
> result in an infinite loop.
Pretty sure your explanation is correct.
Although one may argument in favor of making const methods not cause invariant
checks, that would mean that e.g. getters are no longer protected by
invariants, should something modify the object's state into an invalid one
directly (e.g. by writing to fields).
--
