https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17440
Chris Paulson-Ellis <ch...@edesix.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |ch...@edesix.com
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #8 from Chris Paulson-Ellis <ch...@edesix.com> ---
Reopening for reconsideration, because:
When using Nullable as an analogue of Java Optional or Haskell Maybe, there is
no reason why you shouldn't use a reference type.
Destroying on nullify will invalidate *other* references to the object, which
goes beyond the remit of Nullable.
And finally, because I was asked to submit a bug report and this one already
existed. See forum discussion:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/rglbcxolihbogsvvn...@forum.dlang.org
--
