https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14492
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis <issues.dl...@jmdavisprog.com> --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #7) > DDMD still depends on this heavily. For now scope class is going nowhere, > if the idea of deprecating it hasn't already been completely reversed. If I understand DIP 1000 correctly, I think that the original meaning of scope on class reference is basically becoming an optimization done with scope rather than the direct purpose of the feature, and the work with DIP 1000 should in theory make it @safe. So, if DIP 1000 is accepted (and I assume it will be once it's ready, since it's Walter who's doing it, and he's spent a lot of time on it), then scope on class references is here to stay. --
