https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19057
--- Comment #10 from johanenge...@weka.io --- (In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #9) > (In reply to johanengelen from comment #7) > > This did break code at Weka, luckily in non-silent way, but now I probably > > will have to modify the old compiler to error on these things, to not cause > > trouble with silently broken code. > > I'm curious if there is any reason to have default parameter specification > in any of these cases. Given that you could never use the default parameters > anyway (you had to specify them all), isn't the fix to just change them all > to not have default values? Indeed, the fix is trivial. But finding all places to fix it may not be so easy. Perhaps it's not so bad and a regexp search will find them. I was happy to find out that it never really worked. --