https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16216
--- Comment #3 from ag0aep6g <ag0ae...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Walter Bright from comment #1) > The PR does not affect the `is` comparisons. I'm not sure yet if it should. I think we're good with regards to `is`. The spec says: "For struct objects [...], identity is defined as the bits in the operands being identical." The padding is part of "the bits", so including it in the comparison is correct. I don't know why I thought `is` should behave differently. Maybe I had missed that sentence in the spec. (In reply to Walter Bright from comment #2) > Now fixed for the == and != case. I'm not a fan of calling this "fixed" when it needs a special compiler switch. --
