https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11934
Simen Kjaeraas <simen.kja...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |simen.kja...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Simen Kjaeraas <simen.kja...@gmail.com> ---
Simplified example:
import std.stdio;
import std.algorithm;
struct A {
this(int i) { writeln("ctor ", &this); }
~this() { writeln("dtor ", &this); }
this(this) { writeln("postblit ", &this); }
}
unittest {
writeln("Without ref:");
foreach(r; [1].map!(x => A(x))) { }
writeln("With ref:");
foreach(ref r; [1].map!(x => A(x))) { }
}
As we can see from the output, the dtor is correctly called in the non-ref
case, but not in the ref case. Memory addresses are the same in both cases, and
are stack addresses, so it's not a case of 'allocate on heap and let GC sort it
out'.
As Denis points out though, it may be better for this not to compile than to
compile and silently do something other than expected (even though the ref'ed
struct is mutated, this is not reflected anywhere since it's a temporary).
--
