On 15-08-2011 14:36, torhu wrote:
On 15.08.2011 15:28, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
15.08.2011 9:29, Jacob Carlborg:
On 2011-08-14 22:20, torhu wrote:
On 11.08.2011 19:58, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm planning to move the DWT2 repository to either github or
bitbucket.
Which one would you prefer?
Git seems to require a Unix shell to work on Windows. Which is one of
the things that make me think that git and Windows is not a match made
in heaven. It's a bit like having a crossplatform project that uses
Microsoft's C++ extensions, and requires linux contributors to run MSVC
through Wine to be able to build it. In other words, I would prefer
Bitbucket.
But I don't expect to make big contributions, so it's not going to
matter much for the project.
I have been thinking the same myself. I just haven't figured out how
much of a problem it really is.
Sorry, but I don't see the problem. There is TortoiseGit with very good
Windows explorer integration:
http://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/
And, AFAIK, it's an official git Windows GUI at "Download Git" section:
http://git-scm.com/
Some of us don't want to install yet another shell extension. And I
prefer working on the command line, much quicker and simpler.
Nothing prevents you from invoking git.exe from cmd.exe...
- Alex
