Bill Baxter: > The first time I tried to use it my thought was to do > typedef Exception MyException; > To create a different exception type. That doesn't work so I kinda > just said, eh whatever, this typedef stuff doesn't work yet.
You are right, typedef was invented before classes and OOP, so what you say doesn't work :-) But I think typedef may be modified to work as you want too, that is to define a subtype (so the runtime typeinfo of MyException too has to be different!). I/we can ask Walter what he thinks about this. > Now I can't accidentally assign a vertex handle to a face handle. > That could be useful. Right. But so far I don't see problems in extending the semantics of typedef to work with OOP too. Maybe other people here can spot a problem. I presume Walter doesn't read this newsgroup, so I can post a summary in the main D group too, later. Bye, bearophile
