bearophile пишет: > Weed, some built-ins and significant part of the standard lib (and other libs > you can find around) assume the presence of a GC.
Right. For example, return from function of a dynamic array will not work correctly without GC - there will be a memory leak. > So you can disable (or often just not use it. If you don't allocate/free > GC-managed memory then the GC sleeps) in some critical spots of your code as > I do (and you can also just use memory from the C heap), but if you really > want to remove it, you may want to consider using C++ instead. > > I'd like too to have something like a -nogc compiler flag to not include the > GC at all in small programs that don't use the GC (or use it only to allocate > memory and not to free it). My wishlist also contains -nogc (or may be -gc?) too. But it seems to me it will not occur - too many parts of language mean presence GC. I just would like that D could substitute C++ completely in all applications...
