-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:36 PM, div0<d...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> That's what he's suggesting, and it does make sense.  When you write a
> template, *either* it's meant to be used as a mixin, *or* it's meant
> to be used some other way.  Mixin in a template that wasn't meant to
> be a mixin or vice versa usually makes no sense.

Hmmm.

Not convinced by that argument, I can think of good reasons to use a
template as both.

- --
My enormous talent is exceeded only by my outrageous laziness.
http://www.ssTk.co.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFKjt9eT9LetA9XoXwRAncVAKDMzH22eklNXIU9ec3z0LogoUSKOQCeOht1
gF0Fp+n7roln1WL/Y8Yjqek=
=PRAK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to