> Strange, I cannot compile both of your examples in D2.032 without > getting "final cannot be applied to variable".
Ok I was using D1. Final for variables must have been removed. > const work just fine in D and even better than C's const in my opinion. > I like being able to declare only a part of a type as const, such as > const(int)[], const(void)* or const(immutable(char)[])[]. I cannot tell > about D1's const however, its been so long since I last used it. What I understand is that D1's const force compile-time evaluation whereas D2's don't. Not sure though.
