"BCS" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Hello Nick, > > >> So...is there any trickery I >> could do so that SubFoo!("sam") and SubFoo!("sam", "human") would >> resolve to the same subclass of Foo? > > Make a SubFoo!(char[] s) that does your logic and if it passesa alises to > SubFoo!(s,"") > >
I'm not sure I understand...?
