Ellery Newcomer Wrote: > I just noticed that dup does not dup deep. > > In a two second search I couldn't find any reason for or against, but > I'd kinda like it if > > auto r2 = r.dup; > r2[i][j] = 0; > r[i][j] = 1; > assert(r2[i][j] != r[i][j]); > > held.
There have been discussions about this before. Here is the first I found (couldn't find my own .ddup request :) http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=12631
