I wrote:
> I guess I am worried about what could happen in the case of code like this in
> C++:
>
> for(i=0;i<10000;++i) {
> Foo f(i);
> // Do something with f ...
> }
>
> ... when it reappears in D as:
>
> foreach(uint i;0..10000) {
> auto f = new Foo(i);
> // Do something with f ...
> }
OK, I'm impressed. :-P
I did something equivalent to the above in my 'reputation' code, and ran it
through Valgrind. No difference in number of allocs/frees between a loop of
10000
and a loop of 1.
I think I'm no longer worried. :-)
