W dniu 10.05.2010 21:02, Robert Clipsham pisze:
You are not using a version of gdb with D support if s is not displayed
as a string. This said, I've only ever looked at variables using print
or a backtrace, could you try 'p s' and see what result it gives?
(gdb) p s
$1 = 578159222890430469
No luck :(
If it's the same you aren't using a D capable version of gdb. This said, it
should be working in that version of gdb, I guess there's some other
issues there if this is the case.
Probably
Does anyone can work with gdb on linux?
I do, and it works great for me :)
So I assume you are working on hand patched version of gdb - not the
unchanged one from the official repository?
This said, if you have issues with it
it's good to voice them to either the D community or the gdb devs if
appropriate so we can work out any issues and make debugging D on
linux/freebsd/os x etc a pleasant experience. It isn't right now, but
the situation's far better than it was a few weeks ago (it was
impossible to do anything non-trivial then :P)
I try next gdb snapshot and then if it doesn't work I will fill bug report.
Cheers
Piotrek
