Ali Çehreli <acehr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> double [] foo = new double [cast(int)1e6];
> foo[] = 0;
I've discovered that this is the equivalent of the last line above:
foo = 0;
I don't see it in the spec. Is that an old or an unintended feature?
Looks unintended to me. In fact (though that might be the
C programmer in me doing the thinking), it looks to me like
foo = null;. It might be related to the discussion in
digitalmars.D "Is [] mandatory for array operations?".
--
Simen
