div0 wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
In D2, what is the effect (if any) of 'scope' in the following situations?
scope int a;
Nothing
struct B { ... }
scope B b;
Nothing, B's destructor will be called even without scope.
scope int[] c;
c gets deleted when the scope ends. this applies to classes as well.
// According to the spec, 'in' is shorthand for 'const scope'.
void foo(in char[] d) { ... }
d is const (read only).
I've no idea why scope is mentioned, it's meaningless in the context
of function arguments.
I think in one of the early, complicated versions of the const system,
it meant something. Looks like this mention of it was accidentally left
in the spec.
