On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:59, Simen kjaeraas <simen.kja...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Simen kjaeraas <simen.kja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > How does the current range system accommodate parallel iteration? >> >> As far as I can see, a context switch could happen between calls to >> popFront and front, thus popping a value off the range before we're >> able to get its value. >> > > Anyone? It seems to me the system is not thread-safe, and a parallel > range should have the functions lock() and unlock(), so a foreach > would work basically like this: > I don't know if that'd help you, but did you have a look at David Simcha's parallelFuture module? http://cis.jhu.edu/~dsimcha/parallelFuture.html
