On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:31:30 -0400, Philippe Sigaud <philippe.sig...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 22:00, Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com>wrote:


code i'm not sure what the

     is(char[1 + Range.empty]))



Hm..., then shouldn't that be is(typeof(...))?


But char[1 + ...] is already a type, no? I thought typeof() was to extract
type from an expression?

Yes, you are right, I'll just shut up now :)

-Steve

Reply via email to