On Thursday, August 19, 2010 08:23:42 Simen kjaeraas wrote: > A destructor is always final, and private destructors make no sense, > so I would say the attributes should not be there.
Actually, I could see private destructors making at least some sense. Obviously, the runtime needs to be able to call them, but I could see someone wanting to make it so that a destructor could not be explicitly called by the programmer. I'm not sure that that's ultimately all that useful, but I could see private destructors working that way. - Jonathan M Davis
