> Jonathan M Davis: > > Also, according to TDPL, either your _entire class_ is synchronized, or > > none of > > it is. So, synchronized really belongs on the class, not the function, and I > > wouldn't expect it to compile if only a portion of your functions are > > synchronized (though I don't know how close the current dmd is to TPDL with > > regards to synchronized).
*smacks forehead* Of course. i forgot that detail. I don't work with multi-threads or synchronized much yet.
